Uncertainty continues to cloud infrastructure and climate projects as federal agencies refuse to release funds despite court rulings against the Trump administration’s federal funding freeze. Contractors nationwide are facing stop work orders and terminated contracts as legal battles over Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funds escalate.
President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order, “Unleashing American Energy,” directed federal agencies to pause funding disbursement under these programs. While courts blocked the directive, agencies continue to implement the freeze, citing the need for project compliance reviews under the new administration’s policies.
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is one of many agencies impacted by the freeze, with funding halted for bridge work and court-mandated culvert replacements, according to the Washington State Standard.
One of the most high-profile funding holds involves the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Newly appointed Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy ordered a compliance review of the authority’s federal agreements, putting $4 billion in federal funding for the project at risk, Mass Transit reported.
Meanwhile, 22 state attorneys general have taken the battle to court, challenging the funding freeze. On Feb. 21, a federal judge heard arguments on whether to further block the Trump administration from halting trillions in federal grants, NPR reported.
Despite a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued on Jan. 29, agencies continue to enforce the freeze, arguing that the TRO has a limited scope, said Jackie Unger, partner and Government Contracts Group lead at PilieroMazza, during a Feb. 12 webinar.
“Agencies continue to freeze funds, they’ve refused to resume disbursement of appropriated funds and they’ve continued to issue stop work orders and terminate contracts,” Unger said.
After the Feb. 21 hearing, the judge clarified that his order prohibits all funding freezes based on Trump’s executive order.
“The clarification may give contractors the ability to challenge agency actions in response to the executive orders, if they’re seeing impacts from those,” Unger said.
Despite this, the government has appealed the TRO rulings to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking to reinstate the funding freeze. However, courts have so far denied requests for an immediate stay, meaning the legal fight could stretch for months before a final resolution.
Contractors facing stop work orders should be aware of their rights and take proactive steps.
Under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.242-15, a federal contracting officer can issue a stop work order for up to 90 days. Extensions require reasonable justification and mutual agreement, meaning contractors can push back if necessary, said Lauren Brier, partner at PilieroMazza.
“Once a stop work order is issued, the contractor has an immediate duty to mitigate costs,” Brier said. “You can’t just have people sitting on your payroll for the 90-day period and expect the government to make that payment.”
Contractors can request standby costs, which cover expenses resulting directly from the stop work order, but they must also take action to reduce financial impact, such as:
Additionally, contractors can file a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) to recover legal fees, administrative expenses, and other costs. However, there is no regulatory requirement for the government to respond, Brier warned.
“Another thing that we are suggesting clients do is when they receive a stop work notice, that they reserve their right to challenge the high-level directive to stop work,” Brier said.
To navigate the situation, legal experts recommend the following steps:
With billions of dollars in federal funds at stake, the coming months will be critical for contractors caught in the crossfire. Staying informed, seeking legal counsel, and proactively managing contracts will be essential to navigating this turbulent period.
Originally reported by Julie Strupp in Construction Dive.