
A developer must pay municipal development charges for the second phase of a student-oriented rental housing project in Guelph, Ontario, after the Ontario Land Tribunal upheld the city’s interpretation of its development charges bylaw. The Oct. 29, 2026, decision confirmed that the project at 601 Scottsdale Drive does not qualify for an additional exemption under the applicable framework.
The dispute involved Forum Asset Management and the second phase of a rental housing development geared toward students. In May 2025, Guelph City Council reviewed and rejected the developer’s complaint about the charges.
Forum Asset Management subsequently appealed the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The tribunal upheld the city’s position, confirming that development charges apply to the second phase.
The city said nearly $11 million was at stake in the dispute.
Development charges are collected by municipalities to recover capital costs associated with growth. These charges help fund infrastructure and services such as roads, water and wastewater systems, emergency services, parks, recreation facilities and transit.
Under the Development Charges Act, 1997, certain types of development, including qualifying affordable and rental housing, receive statutory exemptions or discounts.
The second phase at 601 Scottsdale Drive has already received a $2.4-million reduction in municipal development charges for purpose-built rental units, as required under provincial legislation. The tribunal’s decision confirms that this discount does not make the development fully exempt from the remaining charges.
The ruling reinforces the role of development charges in financing infrastructure required to accommodate population and housing growth. For developers, the decision highlights the importance of accounting for applicable municipal charges when assessing project costs and determining whether a development qualifies for statutory exemptions.
For municipalities, the outcome supports the application of development charge bylaws to eligible projects and helps clarify how growth-related infrastructure costs are allocated
Source: Guelph.