Efforts to reduce regulatory barriers to housing construction have reached Albany, as Gov. Kathy Hochul unveils a proposal aimed at accelerating housing development across New York. The plan marks the governor’s most significant housing reform push since a failed zoning overhaul attempt in 2023 and shifts focus away from local land-use authority toward reforming environmental review rules.
Rather than challenging municipalities’ long-standing control over zoning — a politically sensitive move that stalled previous reforms — Hochul’s latest proposal targets the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process. If enacted, the changes could substantially shorten approval timelines for housing projects in areas that are already developed, lowering costs and encouraging new construction.
.jpg)
Under current law, environmental review is required for many discretionary actions by state and local agencies, including zoning changes. While one-, two-, and three-family homes are exempt — a policy that has historically encouraged suburban sprawl — denser housing such as apartment buildings often faces years of review. In regions like New York City, where little undeveloped land remains, this framework has become a significant obstacle to expanding housing supply.
Rezoning proposals that allow apartment buildings typically trigger SEQR, or CEQR within New York City. Developers must complete extensive documentation, often accompanied by hundreds of pages of technical materials, before agencies determine whether a project poses potential environmental impacts. If so, an Environmental Impact Statement is required — a process that can take one to two years and generate thousands of pages of analysis.
Hochul’s proposal acknowledges that denser housing in already urbanized areas does not pose the same environmental concerns that the review system was designed to address. The plan builds on New York City’s “Green Fast Track” initiative introduced in 2024, which offers limited exemptions under the city’s constrained legal authority. The governor’s legislation would significantly expand those exemptions statewide.
In New York City, the proposal would exempt residential projects of up to 500 units in medium- and high-density districts and up to 250 units in lower-density districts from environmental review. Nonresidential space of up to 50,000 square feet would also qualify, though flood zones would remain excluded.
Outside the city, projects with up to 100 housing units would be exempt, provided they are located on previously disturbed sites and connected to existing water and sewer infrastructure. Certain nonresidential components would also be excluded under the plan.
.jpg)
If approved by the legislature, the reforms could dramatically reduce both the time and cost associated with housing approvals, making more developments financially viable. Combined with New York City Charter changes passed by referendum last November — which shortened review timelines for certain zoning actions — the new rules could allow some apartment projects to secure approvals in just a few months, a stark contrast to decades-long norms.
Pro-housing municipalities, real estate interests, and housing advocacy groups such as Open New York and the Regional Plan Association are expected to support the proposal. Resistance is likely from anti-development local governments and community or environmental groups that view the current review process as a mechanism to slow or block growth.
Those groups are expected to find allies in the state legislature, where Democratic supermajorities have historically shown limited urgency in addressing the housing shortage, particularly in downstate regions. Lawmakers may attempt to amend the proposal with additional conditions — such as affordable housing mandates or prevailing-wage requirements — that could reduce its effectiveness and preserve SEQR-related delays.
Hochul’s proposal leaves those broader policy decisions to local governments. Whether the legislature allows the plan to remain streamlined will determine whether the reforms meaningfully address New York’s housing crisis or become another missed opportunity.
If adopted as proposed, the changes could mark a rare shift toward recognizing dense housing as an environmentally sustainable solution rather than a regulatory burden — and could finally begin to untangle a system that has long slowed housing production across the state.
Originally reported by Eric Kober in City Journal.
.png)
