A policy divide has emerged among Republican candidates competing for the congressional seat currently held by Tom Tiffany, with disagreement centering on the long-debated Davis-Bacon Act.
.jpg)
While most candidates in the race have aligned on conservative policy positions, Michael Alfonso has taken a different stance on federal prevailing wage requirements, distinguishing himself from his opponents.
The Davis-Bacon Act requires contractors on federally funded construction projects to pay workers prevailing local wages, a policy supported by labor unions but criticized by some conservative groups and industry advocates.
Among the Republican contenders, Paul Wassgren, Jessi Ebben, and Kevin Hermening have all voiced support for repealing the law, arguing it inflates construction costs and limits competition.
However, Alfonso has taken a more nuanced position.
“I am generally pro Davis-Bacon; however, I think there should be a dollar threshold so that small municipalities aren’t priced out by Davis-Bacon. Also, I’m very anti PLAs.”
His stance places him at odds with fellow candidates who advocate for full repeal of prevailing wage requirements.
Ebben framed repeal as beneficial for smaller firms and taxpayers.
“The repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act would be a win for families and small businesses. The prevailing wage stifles small businesses’ ability to compete for local government contracts, and repealing it would help ensure that our taxpayer dollars are used to pay fair-market rates for construction projects.”
Hermening also emphasized consistency in his opposition.
“I always supported repeal of the prevailing wage and the Davis-Bacon Act. I’ve been very consistent on this.”
Wassgren echoed similar concerns about market impacts.
“Prevailing wage is an anti-free market scheme that puts special interests ahead of hardworking taxpayers. I am 100% in support of repealing the federal prevailing wage.”
Candidate Niina Baum had not yet provided a response at the time of reporting.
The Davis-Bacon Act has long been a point of contention in federal construction policy. Supporters argue it:
Critics, however, contend it:
The issue has played a role in past elections in the district and remains influential among both business groups and labor organizations.
The outcome of this policy debate could have direct implications for:
Construction firms often adjust bidding strategies based on prevailing wage requirements, making the issue particularly relevant to industry stakeholders.
.jpg)
The divide highlights a broader ideological split within conservative circles between:
Alfonso’s position suggests an attempt to balance cost concerns with protections for workers and smaller municipalities.
As the primary race progresses, candidates’ positions on the Davis-Bacon Act may:
Originally reported by Jessica McBride in Wisconsin Right Now.
