.jpg)
A new industry survey examining skilled trades workers in multiple U.S. battleground states points to the growing political influence of nonunion construction labor and renewed debate over federal contracting policies tied to labor requirements.
The survey, conducted across six states including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, focuses on attitudes among construction workers regarding political preferences and federal project labor policies.
According to the survey findings, nonunion workers represent the overwhelming majority of the construction workforce in the states analyzed, comprising an estimated 76% to 98% of skilled trades labor depending on location.
The data suggests that nonunion workers play a significant role in shaping electoral outcomes in regions considered politically competitive, where infrastructure investment and workforce development policies remain key issues for both state and federal lawmakers.
The report highlights differing views between union and nonunion construction workers on federal procurement policies, particularly those related to project labor agreements.
Responses indicate strong support among nonunion workers for open competition in federal contracting, including preferences for contractor selection based on cost and project value rather than labor affiliation requirements.
The survey also shows that a majority of workers across both groups support flexibility in federal procurement decisions, though the intensity of support varies between segments of the workforce.
Project labor agreements have become a recurring point of contention in federal construction policy discussions. Proponents argue that such agreements improve labor stability and project coordination, while critics contend they can limit competition and exclude portions of the workforce from federally funded projects.
The latest survey adds to ongoing industry debate about how federal infrastructure spending should balance labor standards, cost efficiency and workforce inclusivity.
For construction owners and contractors engaged in federally funded work, evolving labor policy discussions could influence bidding structures, workforce planning and project delivery strategies. Changes in project labor agreement requirements may affect eligibility for certain contracts, especially in large infrastructure programs tied to federal funding.
Owners may also need to navigate shifting workforce dynamics in regions where nonunion labor represents the majority of skilled trades capacity. This can impact subcontractor selection, labor availability and project cost structures, particularly in competitive public-sector markets.
As infrastructure investment continues at scale across the United States, alignment between labor policy, procurement rules and workforce capacity will remain a key factor shaping project execution risk and opportunity for construction stakeholders.
Sourced from Associated Builders and Contractors.
